|
|
COMA AROUSAL THEORY
AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
This document is drawn from more than one source,
but ComaCARE acknowledges drawing
heavily in this section from the excellent article from the
Coma Recovery Association (go
to links) which explains the basic principles of coma arousal
theory and therapy. The author is Jacqueline Baker who at the
time of writing, lectured in Nursing Studies at the Sydney College
of Advanced Education. [1]
The theoretical underpinnings of coma arousal therapy lie in
achieving wakefulness in the patient and capitalizing on the
adaptability or plasticity of the brain.
There are four scientific theories that address the issue of
the brain’s apparent adaptability in recovering from brain
injury. These are:
Spare capacity and reorganization
refer to the brain's apparent ability to reorganize its functions
following injury. The premise of this theory is that many parts
of the brain are non-active or "spare", so that when
damage to another part of the brain occurs this "spare"
area is able to assume the function of the damaged area, thereby
compensating for any potential loss of function.
Professor Lorber’s research on people with spina bifida
(A neural tube deficiency in which the spinal chord does not close
completely in utero) illustrates this theory. Many of the subjects
had cerebral ventricular expansion (fluid on the brain) greater
than 90% of the cranium, however over half had IQ scores of greater
than 100 and one an IQ of 126 and a first class honours degree
in mathematics. It would appear that time is a critical factor
if this adaptability is to occur. The slower the insult to the
brain, such as a gradual hydrocephalus, the more likely the brain
is to adapt. Also with ComaCARE the sooner
patients can be interacted with, the more time their brains will
have to adapt.
The redundancy theory is closely related
to the theory of reorganization and refers to the brain’s
apparent ability to duplicate neuronal pathways. Therefore, if
one pathway is damaged the other will be able to take over. It
is believed that this duplication of pathways is the result of
evolution.
The response at a cellular level theory revolves
around the scientific fact that when cells in the central nervous
system are dead, recovery does not occur. From this has come research
on the subsequent effects on cells around the dead area. The work
of Lui and Chambers in 1958 demonstrated that the undamaged axons
of the neurons send out new connections in an attempt to re-wire
the system, a process called collateral sprouting. In this way
the brain attempts to compensate for its slowness to grow new
cells.
The environmental effects theory refers
to the improved performance that is noted in animals and humans
when increased environmental stimulation occurs. Hunter[2]
cites a number of studies which support the theory. For ethical
reasons studies to date have not been carried out on human subjects,
however instances where humans have suffered sensory deprivation
have been studied and in most cases serious neurological deficits
have resulted.
Increased stimulation may therefore result in increased ability
and brain size. It causes activation collateral sprouting which
in turn absorbs the extra space available and causes a reorganization
of the brain's activity.
This process of adaptability is referred to as "re-directing
the call" and Hunter uses the analogy of making a telephone
call. In this article ComaCARE redirects
his theory to include South Africa…..For many years the
caller has been used to picking up the phone and dialling direct
to Johannesburg. One day the direct dialling system does not work,
so the caller goes to the operator to make the connection. The
operator also has difficulty making the connection but eventually
achieves it via Perth, Hong Kong and Frankfurt. Obviously this
takes more time and is more expensive than direct dialling. The
caller later finds out that the direct line with Johannesburg
will never work again, so that to call London it will have to
be via Perth, Hong Kong and Frankfurt. With time, this more cumbersome
method of making the call becomes efficient.
Back to top.
This arousal practice explained is not
ComaCARE’s response to the crisis of coma in the family.
ComaCARE does not deny that in some instances this treatment has
been successful, but looks for a gentler way of working with the
client and a less time consuming one for the family. With training
in coma communication work, carers practicing Coma Arousal could
help clients go further with their awareness while reacting to
stimuli.
The basis of coma arousal therapy lies in the frequency, intensity
and duration of environmental stimuli that the patient receives.
Stimuli may be via the five senses (vision, hearing, touch, taste
and smell) by which the brain receives information about the outside
world plus physical movement. Sensory stimuli are essential factors
in stimulating the reticular activating system (RAS), the consciousness
control centre, to maintain consciousness.
Basically, any comatose patient in a stable medical condition
is considered a suitable subject for a coma arousal programme.
Coma often results from head trauma sustained in motor vehicle
accidents and it is this category of patient most commonly found
in coma arousal programmes.
Patient assessment is essential prior to commencement of the programme.
Although it is relatively easy to assess the physiological state,
it is difficult to measure the degree of brain function. The Glasgow
Coma Scale (GCS) enables a uniform approach to assessing severe
brain injury, but its value is questionable once the patient is
scoring above 9; a score of 8 or less out of a total of 15 is
usually considered to indicate coma.
Coma arousal therapy usually commences as soon as possible after
the development of coma and may start in the intensive care unit
providing the person’s medical condition is stable. As will
be seen, coma arousal programmes are very labour intensive and
it has been suggested that the best therapists are those who are
interested and caring - frequently relatives, partners or friends.
In addition, those closest to the person are more likely to notice
and receive a response.
The pupillary reflex is the lowest level of visual function, although
this reflex may not be initiated in the coma patient, it does
not necessarily indicate absence of any visual function. It is
proposed that a light source sufficient to achieve a response
(constrict the pupil) may be in the order of 150 watts. ( It is
often higher than this).
Having achieved pupil constriction the visual stimulus is changed
to include, for example, the use of strobe and flashing lights.
Once the patient's eyes remain open flash cards are used. These
usually have words or pictures printed on them and should indicate
a clear contrast - for example red writing on a yellow background.
They are accompanied by a verbal indication of what is printed.
In addition, different shapes and colours are introduced.
The startle reflex is the lowest level of auditory function and
as with visual stimulation, the type of response is dependent
on the intensity of the stimulus. Noises that might cause conscious
people to startle will not stimulate the comatose. Therefore very
loud noises (such as banging two saucepans together, ringing a
bell or blowing a loud whistle directly near the patient) are
used to achieve a response. These noise stimuli are irregular
as the brain has the ability to "turn-off" continual
sound.
The third sensory modality, touch, can be achieved by deep pressure
massage, pinching and slapping, and use of a vibrator, loofah
sponge and brushes are also suggested. Whatever type of tactile
stimulus is used it is important that it be "rough"
as the intensity of the stimulus is the important factor in gaining
a response.
Facial grimacing is believed to be an indicator that the taste
sense is working. It is suggested that there should be use of
such substances as vinegar, lemon juice, mustard, soy sauce, chilli
and salt as an intensive or noxious stimuli. Caution should is
employed if the patient has an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube.
Smell may be stimulated with the use of peppermint oil, eucalyptus
oil, garlic, strong perfumes, rubbing alcohol and spirits of
ammonia. It is believed positive if the patient grimaces or
attempts to withdraw.
The methods outlined are used to achieve some response from
the patient to indicate an awareness of the surroundings. At
the same time, provided their physical status is stable, mobility
stimulus is introduced. Initially, range-of-movement exercises
are commenced, eventually progressing to the use of tilt tables.
Later the patient is placed on a very large ball in either the
prone or supine position to help stimulate balance and head
control. Other activities that may be used include rolling the
patient from side-to-side on a mat.
It is believed by proponents of coma arousal therapy that the
frequency, intensity and duration of the stimulus is the most
effective means by which the brain can learn. For this reason
the coma arousal program commences at an hour per day, gradually
increasing to an intense six to eight hours per day. Due
to the type of therapy employed and its frequency and duration,
arousal programs are labour intensive and time consuming.
Therapy is thus usually given by relatives or significant others
who have been educated in the process. Professional therapists
who have been involved in coma arousal programs emphasize the
very positive effects of such involvement for the relatives.
They report that it gives people a sense of purpose, enabling
them to channel their efforts and feelings into positive activities.
Back to top
In this section ComaCARE provides
a synopsis of a coma recovery programme Instituted by the International
Coma Recovery Institute(ICRI). To fully appreciate the work
of this institute go to links.
The International Coma Recovery Institute has a liberal policy
in terms of prognosis before admission to their programme. In
fact, for almost all patients accepted into this program, the
medical prognosis is "hopeless" in terms of any recovery
from coma; families have previously been told that the patient
will never improve. The coma recovery team does not believe
that most cases are hopeless. The ICRI program is based on the
belief that in most cases the patient can be aroused and elevated
to a higher level of functioning and has had successes.
Back to top
The ICRI programme is different from most other coma recovery
programmes in that it begins in an acute care facility but is
subsequently carried out in the patient's home. Patients remain
in the hospital for seven to 10 days before returning to their
own community, where the stimulation programme is implemented.
During the hospital stay, a thorough evaluation is done by the
physician and nurse on the team. An EEG, CT scan and bloodwork
are done. The patient is observed for hours at a time for many
sessions to ascertain level of awareness and reactivity, with
further input obtained from the family and staff nurses.
During this time, the patient may be weaned off drugs previously
prescribed for seizures and spasticity. Often
these drugs, such as diazepam (Valium®), phenytoin (Dilantin®),
and phenobarbital, have been given in such high doses that
they are contributing to the patient's lack of awareness.
If anticonvulsants are necessary, they are given in low doses.
The combination drug carbidopa/levodopa (Sinemet®), which
is usually used for the rigidity of Parkinson's Disease, has
been successfully used in this program to control spasticity
(increased tone in flexor and extensor muscles) and rigidity
(general increase in muscle tone with slowness of movement)
in these patients, and does not sedate the patient as does
diazepam. If possible, tubes that the patient came with are
removed. The Foley catheter is taken out within 24 hours and
absorbent briefs or external collection devices are used.
Tracheostomy tubes are removed if the patient has good cough
and gag reflexes. Feeding tubes are removed if the patient
has swallow and gag reflexes, is capable of swallowing semi-solid
foods and is able to eat enough to maintain weight and good
nutrition.
An intense multi-sensory and physical stimulation plan is
then designed for the patient, usually by the fourth day in
the hospital. This plan is individualized depending on the
level of awareness and sensory and motor function of the patient.
The initial observations and evaluation by the nurse and physician,
previously mentioned, are the baseline assessment on which
the patient's program plan is based.
The patient's reactivity to the stimulation of each sense
is recorded on a scale of 1-6, as are motor functions of the
extremities. Reactivity that is low on the scale indicates
a need for a more intensive stimulation program than reactivity
that is closer to 6 on the scale. Go to
Table 2.
As the word multi-sensory implies, all the senses are stimulated
at the level that the patient requires. For example, if the
patient's eyes are always closed or there is lack of a blink
reflex, visual stimulation is done by shining a 650-watt light
on the eyes, one second on, one second off, and repeated several
times. The bright light stimulates the blink reflex, and once
this reflex returns, this intense stimulation is stopped.
Following development and plan implementation, the nurse
teaches family members to carry out the programme along with
any additional nursing procedures that are necessary. The
patient is evaluated for tolerance of the programme by monitoring
pulse and respirations; development of any seizure activity
signals a need for a change in medication or a change in the
programme.
The family members practice going through the stimulation
programme for a few days until they feel secure, and the nurse
evaluates their performance. Usually the
family goes through the stimulation cycles about five times
a day in the hospital; but when the patient is sent home,
it is expected that the cycles will be carried out about 11
times a day. Each cycle of sensory and physical stimulation
and breathing exercises takes approximately 45 minutes. Rest
periods or other care requirements are carried out between
cycles. The entire programme is usually carried out for a
maximum of 12 hours a day.
Patients are kept on the ICRI program as long as the family
wishes to participate in the programme and as long as the
patient is showing progress. If no progress is seen in the
first four to six months, during which time the stimulation
cycles have been carried out 11 times a day, a conference
is held with the family, the physician and the nurse to discuss
the lack of progress and futility of continuing with the programme.
Back to top
After the patient has been discharged from the hospital,
the patient may go home to be taken care of by private
duty nurses or by the family; a few patients have gone
to nursing homes where private duty nurses provide care.
Frequently, the private duty nurses are hired from an
agency that trains a group of nurses to work with coma
patients. The family always retains the primary responsibility
for the programme's implementation. Sometimes family members
themselves teach the nurses how to carry out the intense
multi-sensory and physical stimulation programme. Physical
therapists and speech therapists are consulted as necessary.
Back to top
Nurses working in coma recovery programmes
find they are exciting and challenging. Over the long
run, however, burnout frequently occurs. A lack
of significant improvement or the slowness of improvement
and the eventual monotony of the routine probably contribute
to the problem. A study by Loen and Snyder (1980) of 91
nurses who worked with comatose patients revealed that
38 percent of the nurses believed the "hopeless situation"
of the comatose patients made nursing care difficult,
and 36 percent believed the nurse should be reassigned
every two to three days.
Nurses who work with coma patients in acute-care settings
would do well to investigate various coma recovery programmes
in their areas to see what they have to offer the comatose
patients and their families. Inpatient facilities may
be the best choice for families who cannot take on the
responsibilities of patient care. Programs like the ICRI
are most suitable for families who are energetic and who
want to be involved in the care of their loved one, if
not totally responsible for it.
Back to top
The difficulties of this programme
for South Africa may include:
-
Initial high cost in a
specialized or tertiary institution.
-
Heavy labour requirements
(the regularity and intensity of the intervention) from
family members who are already overburdened with daily
life survival mechanisms.
-
Suitable home environments
where there may be no easy access to water, sanitation,
electricity etc.
-
The potential for carer
burnout. where there are single headed households and
more than one family member could be suffering from
an illness such as T.B. and HIV/AIDS.
-
Also, The assumption that
coma is an undesirable state from which a patient must
be forcibly extracted is not questioned in many of the
arousal programmes, despite many accounts of coma patients
explaining the deep and meaningful nature of their coma
state which subsequently changed their lives.
It is ComaCARE’s observation that clients often
need support to go further with their inner states and
complete them, before gaining more consciousness in consensus
(day to day) reality. It would be hoped that exploring
less intrusive methods could support the patient’s
own processes and rights.
Back to top
| Table
1. Multisensory Program Components (Sample) (Low-Level)
|
|
| Function |
Type |
Method |
Frequency of administration |
Method of evaluation |
|
|
| Visual |
Bright light |
On/off for 1 sec for 10 sec |
q hr x 11 hrs |
Pupillary reaction, initiation of
eye blink or movement of head |
| Auditory |
Simple, loud sound next to ear |
Clap 2 pieces metal or wood next
to L ear, R ear |
3 x per hour x 11 hours |
Patient initiates blink or head turning
briskly upon auditory stimulation or startle reflex |
| Olfactory |
Ammonia |
5 sec. under each nostril |
q hr x 11 hrs |
Tearing, facial flush, breath holding,
withdrawal |
| Taste |
Tabasco sauce |
1 drop on tongue |
1 x per hour x 11 hours |
Diaphoresis, facial flush, spitting,
swallowing |
| Light touch |
Feather or sponge |
Down limbs-first one side, then the
other |
q hr x 11 hrs |
Continued until patient can give
verbal response |
| Pressure |
Increased pressure against muscles |
Down limbs-first one side, then the
other |
q hr x 11 hrs |
Continued until patient can give
verbal response |
| Pain |
Pressure to TMJ; trapezius muscle;
fingernail beds |
Up to 5 sec. |
q hr x 11 hrs |
Withdrawal |
| Range of motion |
Range of motion |
ROM to all joints |
Approx. 150 ranges of each joint
per day |
Degree of range patient participation |
| |
Alternating movements |
Arms raised alternately; legs raised
alternately |
15 x per hour x 11 hours |
Degree of range patient participation |
| Table
2. Scale of Patient Responses |
| (1
= lowest level of response; 6 = highest level of response) |
|
| Visual |
Olfactory |
Gustatory |
|
- Pupil dilated with no response to light
- Pupils constrict appropriately to light
- Eyes track moving object
- Perceives color and light
- Recognizes written/pictorial image
|
- No reaction to ammonia spirits
- Nose twitching, tearing, flushing of face with ammonia
- Turning of head away from stimulus
|
- No swallow/gag/cough reflex
- Poor swallow reflex; saliva drools
- Inability to open mouth
- Tongue moves food efficiently for swallow
- Patient eating semi-solids
- Patient drinking fluids
|
|
| Auditory |
Tactile |
Range
of Motion |
|
- No reaction to loud stimulus
- Patient startles appropriately to loud stimulus
- Turns head to voice
- Follows commands
|
- No response to deep pain
- Withdrawal to painful stimulus
- No response to light touch, pressure, vibration
- Piloerection to cold stimulus
- Withdrawal to cold stimulus
|
- Flaccidity
- No voluntary movement
- Spasticity of joints
- Moves joint/limb to command
- Assists with exercises
|
| Patient can be at different levels of senses
at any given time. |
1. The full article of which this is a very
abridged version, was originally published in the June 1988,
Volume 17, No. 11, issue of THE AUSTRALIAN NURSES JOURNAL.
[2] Hunter, I. Brain Injury: Tapping the
Potential Within, Melbourne, Hill of Content Publishing Co.,
1986,pp.40-44.
return to COMA CARE
|
|